I guess when you're a carpenter with a hammer, everything's a nail. Dawkins WASN'T trying to make a joke, like, at all. He was trying to make a point. He didn't say anything even near deserving of an apology. - Derp
I thought the above comment from
Elevatorgate And Comedy Writing Suggestions For Dr. Dawkins warranted a post, because it really helped to clarify and refine my thoughts a bit.
But, first I want to thank Derp for commenting, though I respectfully have some issues with his(?) thinking on this.
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I'm calling it a duck.
When a person writes
Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and . . . yawn . . . don’t tell me yet again
that strikes me as the writer using a satirical voice to make his/her point. And satire, if nothing else, is in the realm of dark comedy.
Respect. Respect. Respect.
I don't care if you are 10 years old and on the playground or 45 in corporate America if someone
doesn't show you respect, then there is a problem. The comment that Dawkins wrote not only had a satirical tone, but it was of a parent talking down to a child.
For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.
I have led small groups on nonviolent interventions for those who work with violent people. This is part of my message:
It isn't as much what you say, it is how you say it. I have a few theist friends, and though I may strongly disagree with them on the God issues, I try my best to show respect (feelings may get hurt, but one can only make a good faith effort to prevent that). This way I am far more likely to be listened to. In this manner they hear my argument much more clearly.
I think Dr. Dawkins' reasoning is a bit off.
Please humor me with a small thought experiment. Say we have two bad situations
A and
B. However,
B is much, much worse than
A. Should we ignore
A, or belittle those who work to eradicate it? Let's imagine that Jim Crow laws still exists in the South (
A), but full blown slavery is in force in some other country (
B). Should we not still strive to fight against
A?
Now, a person would be in their right to craft an argument that
A (the elevator incident) isn't something to get worked up about. But they shouldn't build their polemic by saying "Look here, there are more serious things in the world to worry about. Oh, by the way, grow up"
LiP