Before delving into the poll results many of you may have said to yourselves,
What a stupid question to ask. All that mess got discussed a few years ago. Why bring it up now?
Well, I sincerely hope none of you thought that, and not because I'm sensitive to that kind of thing either. (A prerequisite for blogging is a rather thick skin.) Rather, I would think that being the politically aware readers that I'm sure you are understand that during the upcoming election Obama's adversaries will say whatever is necessary in order to score political points. This is not picking on Republicans either, as all politicians since time immemorial have gauged the value of slinging mud. Also, I have heard a few arguments that range from Christopher Hitchens saying
Of course, he's an atheist to PZ Meyers saying
Of course, he's not an atheist . There is a difference of opinions here, and though I am not in either of the aforementioned man's category in terms of a thinker (the benefit of writing comedy is being able to shrug the shoulders and saying
Hey, I'm just a guy who does jokes - Jon Stewart being a perfect example) I am going to take a shot at the topic.
We'll start off with the obvious: Unless one has perfected mind reading technology, knowing a person's heart is impossible. Who among us haven't been surprised when a close friend or lover made a disclosure that is simply jaw dropping? Up until that moment you had one particular idea about that person and then a split second later your whole opinion of them changes. And politicians are extremely talented in hiding their real thoughts. You only have to look at Arnold Schwarzenegger and John Edwards to see prime examples at how well politicians keep their cards close, if not their pants zipped. So from the get go we are in murky waters. However, that does not mean we can't make an educated guess.
Is it the best guess that Obama is not an atheist?
I'd like to quote
PZ Meyers when he wrote about Obama and atheism,
Maybe it's a science thing: use Occam's Razor and make minimal assumptions, and use the simplest explanation to see if it is sufficient to explain a phenomenon. And I'm sorry for those who want him in our club, but the simplest explanation is that he is what he says he is, and nothing in his observed behavior contradicts that.
As I stated previously, a politician can not be taken at his or her word, particularly pols who are actively politicking. Have you noticed that retired politicians are often part of bilateral commissions? It's because their expertise is not held captive to getting reelected. An elected official must always look for the most appropriate way to frame ideas, whether they're giving a speech or responding to a spontaneous question from a member of the public. For that matter, only the elderly, children, and the insane are those who truly say what they think. Well, what about Obama's actions? The man hasn't dismantled the government's faith based initiatives, has he? He still continued the noxious National Day of Prayer. Once again, Obama wants to get reelected. Why would he start a fight if there was only political grief to be had? Atheists are not a political force in this country. Playing to "our side" is a useless endeavor, politically speaking. (The moral here is that atheists need to organize locally and convince others that religion is the stuff of fairy tales.)
Is the best guess that Obama is an atheist?
What evidence there is points more in this direction, in my opinion. Here is a quick vid with Christopher Hitchens.
Here, Hitchens states the obvious 1) Obama was raised effectively without faith and stated that fact before running for the presidency; 2) Being a politician in Chicago (and the US for that matter) requires appearing religious; 3) Obama had made more recent statements that religion and the state are not to be intermingled. The first point I find particularly telling, because if a person has not been indoctrinated from an early age in faith, then they are much more likely to apply skepticism to religion. (As the Jesuit saying goes Give me a child for for his first seven years and I'll give you the man.) The second point is congruent with the Basic Law of Politicians - Lie regularly, boldly lie when needed. Repeat as necessary. The third point I weigh less than the previous two because Obama could have been playing to his liberal base when talking about separating church and state.
There, that's how I call it. Most of you - 82%- voted that he isn't an atheist, placing me in the minority. Meh, I'm OK with that. Intelligent people can have different views on this matter and still be considered rational.
I'm confident enough to put money on the fact that Obama is one of the godless, though the he will not admit to it (if at all) until he has long retired...
or it becomes politically expedient.
This is Purgatory.